The Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction continues its “School Bond Accountability Project” by sending out a mailer to 50,000 San Diego households reminding them that the Board of Education of the San Diego Unified School District requires construction contractors to sign a Project Labor Agreement with unions in order to work on certain projects funded by school district bond sales.
In November 2008, voters approved Proposition S, authorizing the Board of Education of the San Diego Unified School District to borrow $2.1 billion for construction (and apparently, iPads) by selling bonds to investors. Voters had no indication that the Board of Education would promptly make a deal with construction unions to give them a monopoly on construction with a Project Labor Agreement. (See San Diego Unified School District Proposition S Project Labor Agreement 2009.)
Project Labor Agreement Policies for San Diego Unified School District
|1999||Union officials unsuccessfully lobby the school board and district officials to require contractors to sign a Project Labor Agreement for construction funded by Proposition MM.|
|May 26, 2009||Board votes 3-2 to approve a Project Labor Agreement for construction funded by Proposition S.|
|July 24, 2009||Board again votes 3-2 to approve a Project Labor Agreement for construction funded by Proposition S, replacing the first, defective agreement with a new agreement containing terms and conditions acceptable to the Carpenters Union.|
|July 24, 2012||July 24, 2012 – Board votes 5-0 for a resolution expanding the scope of the Project Labor Agreement to projects funded by future bond measures, thus imposing the Project Labor Agreement on projects funded by the proposed $2.8 billion bond measure on the November 6, 2012 ballot.|
Now the Board of Education wants to borrow another $2.8 billion! It wants voters to approve Proposition Z, authorizing more bond sales for construction. The Board of Education of the San Diego Unified School District also passed a resolution on a 5-0 vote committing to require contractors to sign a Project Labor Agreement with unions in order to work on projects funded by Proposition Z.
Read this list of contributors to the campaign to convince voters to let the San Diego Unified School District sink under another $2.8 billion (plus interest) in debt with Prop Z. It includes ONE San Francisco investment banker who has essentially funded 20% of the campaign.
The Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction sent this press release out today (November 1, 2012):
CFEC Mails 50,000 Taxpayers in San Diego Reminding Them How San Diego Unified Spends Bond Money Wastefully
San Diego, CA – 50,000 households within the San Diego Unified School District (SDUSD) will be receiving this mailer over the next couple of days reminding them how the San Diego Unified School District spends bond money.
Proposition S, a $2.1 billion school construction bond passed by voters in 2008, was placed under a union-crafted Project Labor Agreement (PLA) in early 2009. This payoff to the union bosses who financed school board members’ political campaigns has resulted in the district having 50% fewer bidders on projects while the costs of those projects are 20% higher than non-PLA projects.
SDUSD is paying $1 million annually just to oversee the PLA.
“SDUSD homeowners are currently on the hook for $4.7 BILLION in debt for all previous bonds. What they receive for that debt, however, is further reduced in value due to the PLA.” said CFEC’s Eric Christen.
What are homeowners getting for all of this wealth they are giving up?
iPads that cost you and me $500 but SDUSD pays $4,000 to be paid back over 40 years. This means current SDUSD students’ GRANDCHILDREN will still be paying off iPads that were thrown away 30 years before they were even born.
The facts regarding the failures of how Prop S money is spent certainly did not come from the District which has admitted that the records it keeps on how Prop S funds were spent are “incomplete” and essentially misleading.
“Voters need to know the fiscally reckless manner in which this District is spending billions in taxpayers dollars” added Christen. “This mailer will help accomplish this goal.”
To date approximately 20% of the money authorized to be spent under Prop S has in fact been spent.